Data Availability Statement: A Tool for Enhancing Research Trust
https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2024.2.72
Abstract
This editorial article discusses the importance of the Data Availability Statement (DAS) in scientific publications. The statement provides information on the location of data used in the research and the conditions for accessing it, which promotes transparency and reproducibility of scientific results. The article presents templates for drafting a DAS, which can be adapted depending on the nature of the data and the requirements of scientific journals. The article emphasizes the significance of correctly preparing the statement to strengthen trust in research outcomes. The article is structured in a Q&A format addressing the most common questions from research authors.
About the Authors
Elena V. TikhonovaRussian Federation
Nataliia M. Mekeko
References
1. Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533, 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a
2. Cech, T. R., Eddy, S. R., Eisenberg, D., Hersey, K., Holtzman, S. H., Poste, G. H., Raikhel, N. V., Scheller, R. H., Singer, D. B., & Waltham, M. C. (2003). Sharing publication-related data and materials: Responsibilities of authorship in the life sciences. Plant Physiology, 132(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.900068
3. Colavizza, G., Hrynaszkiewicz, I., Staden, I., Whitaker, K., & McGillivray, B. (2020). The citation advantage of linking publications to research data. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0230416. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416
4. Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2010). The essential nature of sharing in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 783–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9239-x
5. Hardwicke, T. E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Populating the Data Ark: An attempt to retrieve, preserve, and liberate data from the most highly-cited psychology and psychiatry articles. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0201856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201856
6. Hardwicke, T. E., Mathur, M. B., MacDonald, K., Nilsonne, G., Banks, G. C., Kidwell, M. C., Hofelich Mohr, A., Clayton, E., Yoon, E. J., Henry Tessler, M., Lenne, R. L., Altman, S., Long, B., & Frank, M. C. (2018). Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 180448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448
7. Krawczyk, M., & Reuben, E. (2012). (Un)Available upon request: Field experiment on researchers’ willingness to share supplementary materials. Accountability in Research, 19(3), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.678688
8. Longo, D. L., & Drazen, J. M. (2016). Data sharing. The New England Journal of Medicine, 374(3), 276–277. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1516564
9. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
10. Piwowar, H. A., Day, R. S., & Fridsma, D. B. (2007). Sharing detailed research data is associated with increased citation rate. PLoS ONE, 2(3), e308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
11. Roche, D. G., Kruuk, L. E. B., Lanfear, R., & Binning, S. A. (2015). Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: How well are we doing? PLOS Biology, 13(11), e1002295. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295
12. Tedersoo, L., Küngas, R., Oras, E., Köster, K., Eenmaa, H., Leijen, Ä., Pedaste, M., Raju, M., Astapova, A., Lukner, H., Kogermann, K., & Sepp, T. (2021). Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Scientific Data, 8(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0
13. Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Pjesivac, I., Birch, B., Pollock, D., & Dorsett, K. (2015). Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0134826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
14. Vines, T. H., Andrew, R. L., Bock, D. G., Franklin, M. T., Gilbert, K. J., Kane, N. C., Moore, J., Moyers, B. T., Renaut, S., Rennison, D. J., Veen, T., & Yeaman, S. (2013). Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. The FASEB Journal, 27(4), 1304–1308. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.12-218164
15. Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013). If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e67332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
16. Wicherts, J. M., Bakker, M., & Molenaar, D. (2011). Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e26828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026828
Review
For citations:
Tikhonova E.V., Mekeko N.M. Data Availability Statement: A Tool for Enhancing Research Trust. Journal of Employment and Career. 2024;3(2). https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2024.2.72
Email this article 