Высшее учебное заведение как коммуникативная площадка: развитие навыков профессиональной коммуникации в контексте начальной профессионализации

Введение: В современном образовательном процессе особенно важным становится развитие навыков профессиональной коммуникации у студентов, ключевых для их будущей карьеры.

Цель: исследование направлено на анализ роли коммуникативного пространства учебных заведений в качестве платформы для развития профессиональных коммуникативных навыков студентов.

Материалы и методы: Анализируется, как академические и внеучебные мероприятия, а также групповые проекты в учебных заведениях способствуют развитию коммуникативных умений.

Результаты: В статье демонстрируется, что структурированное коммуникативное пространство образовательных учреждений играет ключевую роль в формировании и совершенствовании навыков профессиональной коммуникации у студентов.

Выводы: Подчеркивается значимость комплексного подхода к обучению коммуникативным навыкам в рамках профессиональной подготовки студентов, что требует активного участия как со стороны преподавателей, так и студентов для достижения максимальной эффективности образовательного процесса.

1. Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 713057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057

2. Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–590.

3. Brown, B., & Bell, M. (2004). Social interaction in ‘there’. In CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1465–1468). Vienna, Austria.

4. Brown, B., & Bell, M. (2004). CSCW at play: 'There' as a collaborative virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 350–359).

5. Brown, T., Yu, M., & Etherington, J. (2020). Are listening and interpersonal communication skills predictive of professionalism in undergraduate occupational therapy students? Health Professions Education, 6(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2020.01.001

6. Cecilia Obi Nja, C. O., Anari, M. I., Erim, C. M., Idiege, K. J., Ilhami, A., Ukah, J. U., Eneyo, O. E., Uwe, U. E., & Cornelius-Ukpepi, B. U. (2023). Learning space, students’ collaboration, educational outcomes, and interest: Exploring the physical, social and psychological mediators. Heliyon, 9(4), e15456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15456

7. Christmann, G. B., Knoblauch, H., & Löw, M. (2022). Communicative constructions and the refiguration of spaces. Abingdon: Routledge.

8. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

9. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. J. (2006). Alone together? Exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 407–416). Montreal, Canada.

11. Fernandez, R., Ginzburg, J., & Lappin, S. (2004). Classifying ellipsis in dialogue: A machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (CoLing) (pp. 240–246).

12. Fitzpatrick, G. (1998). The Locales framework: Understanding and designing for cooperative work (PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland).

13. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

14. Hardavella, G., Aamli-Gaagnat, A., Saad, N., Rousalova, I., & Sreter, K. B. (2017). How to give and receive feedback effectively. Breathe, 13(4), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.009917

15. Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). Boston, MA, USA.

16. Heidegger, M. (1927/1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.

17. Ilyicheva, I. (2022). Modern aspects of studying the communicative space of the region (by the example of Brest region). Cherepovets State University Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.23859/1994-0637-2022-5-110-10

18. Johnson, R., Purcell, A., Power, E., & Cumming, S. (2021). “The early exposure is really helpful” – Students’ views of participating in communication skills screening. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care, 9(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.18552/ijpblhsc.v9i1.712

19. Keller, R. (2013). Doing discourse research: An introduction for social scientists. London: Sage.

20. Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging out in the virtual pub: Masculinities and relationships online. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

21. Knoblauch, H., & Löw, M. (2020). The re-figuration of spaces and refigured modernity – Concept and diagnosis. Historical Social Research, 45(2), 263–292.

22. Kupritz, V. W., & Hillsman, T. (2011). The impact of the physical environment on supervisory communication skills transfer. Journal of Business Communication, 48(2), 148–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610397269

23. Levinson, S. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing. In Exploring the interaction order (pp. 170–193). In E. Goffman (Ed.), Erving Goffman.

24. Light, A. (2007). Transports of delight?: What the experience of receiving (mobile) phone calls can tell us about design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0095-6

25. Löw, M. (2016). The sociology of space: Materiality, social structures, and action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

26. Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832

27. Miller, B. T., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

28. Mohammad Ismail Stanikzai. (2023). Critical thinking, collaboration, creativity and communication skills among school students: A review paper. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(5), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).34

29. Mulhall, S. (2005). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Heidegger and Being and Time. London: Routledge.

30. Nevdakh, S. (2020). Communicative space of educational classes as a condition for successful adult education. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 13, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2020.012

31. Papaioannou, G., Volakaki, M. G., Kokolakis, S., & Vouyioukas, D. (2023). Learning spaces in higher education: A state-of-the-art review. Trends in Higher Education, 2(3), 526-545. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu2030032

32. Raptou, E., Stamatis, P., & Raptis, N. (2017). Communication as an educational skill in school units of the 21st century: A survey research. Advances in Engineering Software, 2(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v2i2.153

33. Sjølie, E., Francisco, S., & Langelotz, L. (2018). Communicative learning spaces and learning to become a teacher. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27, 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1500392

34. Skagen, D., McCollum, B., Morsch, L., & Shokoples, B. (2018). Developing communication confidence and professional identity in chemistry through international online collaborative learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00220c

35. Smith, M. A., Farnham, S. D., & Drucker, S. M. (2000). The social life of small graphical chat spaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 462–469). The Hague, The Netherlands.

36. Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054

37. Trepper, K., Levine, S., Lomelí, K., & Garcia, A. (2023). One text, two worlds, third space: Design principles for bridging the two-worlds divide in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 129, 104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104144

38. Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(Suppl), S54–S66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501

39. Vorwerg, C. (2015). Communicative competence: Linguistic aspects. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 294-301). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53042-6