Research Activity of Students: Primary Professionalization vs. Scientific Discourse

Introduction: Student research activities are a critically important element of higher education, especially in the context of the modern labor market, which demands that graduates possess research competencies. The introduction emphasizes the significance of primary professionalization, student engagement in the academic community, and their contribution to the creation of new knowledge.

The purpose of this article is to analyze the role of student research activities in their professionalization, as well as to examine the factors influencing their participation in research, such as critical evaluation and peer review, and how these factors support their integration into the academic community.

Main Points: The study considers primary professionalization as a key stage in the formation of professional identity, showing how student participation in research contributes to this process. Student engagement in the academic community is analyzed in terms of its importance for expanding knowledge, developing critical thinking, and strengthening professional identity. Special attention is given to how students can contribute to science through original research and publications, and how critical evaluation and peer review help develop skills in objective analysis and foster a culture of continuous improvement.

Conclusion: The need for active student involvement in research activities for their professional growth is evident. It is recommended to integrate real research activities into the educational process, allowing students to develop key research competencies and make meaningful contributions to the academic community.

1. Anderson, C., Day, K., & McLaughlin, P. (2008). Student perspectives on the dissertation process in a masters degree concerned with professional practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370701841531

2. Barnacle, R., & Usher, R. (2003). Assessing the quality of research training: The case of part-time candidates in full-time professional work. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436032000145185

3. Bieliauskaitė, J. (2021). Solidarity in academia and its relationship to academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09420-6

4. Brew, A. (2001). The nature of research inquiry in academic contexts. London: Routledge Falmer.

5. De Kleijn, R., Meijer, P., Brekelmans, M., & Pilot, A. (2013). Curricular goals and personal goals in master’s thesis projects: Dutch student-supervisor dyads. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(1), 1–11.

6. De Kleijn, R., Meijer, P., Pilot, A., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). The relationship between feedback perceptions and the supervisor–student relationship in master’s thesis projects. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 336–349.

7. Drennan, J., & Clarke, M. (2009). Coursework master’s programmes: The student’s experience of research and research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 483–500.

8. Ginn, F. (2014). Being like a researcher: Supervising masters dissertations in a neoliberalizing university. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(1), 106–118.

9. Landor, M. (2011). Is the glass half-full or half-empty? Perceptions of recently-qualified educational psychologists on the effectiveness and impact of their master’s level research. Educational Psychology in Practice, 27(1), 83–95.

10. Oguan Jr., F. E., Bernal, M. M., & Pinca, M. C. D. (2014). Attitude and anxiety towards research, its influence on the students’ achievement in the course. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 3(4), 165–172.

11. Pilcher, N. (2011). The UK postgraduate masters dissertation: An ‘elusive chameleon’? Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 29–40.

12. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). The pipeline: Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548–549.

13. Sachitra, V. (2016). Undergraduates and interest in doing research: Study based on bachelor of commerce undergraduates. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 484–487. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-6-7

14. Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67.

15. Shaw, C., & le Roux, K. (2017). From practitioner to researcher: Designing the dissertation process for part time professional coursework masters students. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(5), 433–446.

16. Sinkovics, R., Richardson, C., & Lew, Y. (2015). Enhancing student competency and employability in international business through masters dissertations. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 26(4), 239–317.

17. Stierer, B. (2000). Schoolteachers as students: Academic literacy and the construction of professional knowledge within master’s courses in education. In M. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 179–195). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

18. Tikhonova, E. V., Kosycheva, M. A., & Efremova, G. I. (2021). Primary professionalization of foreign students: Barriers, stigmatization, adaptation. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education, 25(4), 608–628. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.105.025.202104.608-628

19. Walkington, H. (2015). Students as researchers: Supporting undergraduate research in the disciplines in higher education. The Higher Education Academy.