Policy of Scientific Journals Regarding the Use of Neural Networks by Authors in Manuscript Preparation
https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2023.4.45
Abstract
The article discusses the role of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, in scientific communication and the writing of research papers. The author comments on the advantages and challenges associated with using AI in the creation of scientific reviews and other forms of academic writing. Special attention is given to the ethical and legal aspects of using such technologies, as well as their impact on the quality and reliability of scientific publications. Examples are provided of how AI can assist researchers in writing articles; however, the need for a cautious approach and adherence to established editorial policies is emphasized. The author concludes that while ChatGPT can significantly ease the writing and editing process, it should not replace the role of the author and requires careful oversight and verification of results.
References
1. Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature, 613, 423.
2. Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 20(6), 327–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x
3. Hu, G. (2023). Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers. Accountability in Research, 30(1–3).
4. Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148–1154.
5. Hutson, M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611, 192–193.
6. Kurian, N., Cherian, J. M., Sudharson, N. A., Varghese, K. G., & Wadhwa, S. (2023). AI is now everywhere. British Dental Journal, 234(72).
7. Pividori, M., & Greene, C. S. (2023). A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring. bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology, 2023.01.21.525030. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.21.525030
8. Schoot, R. V. D., Bruin, J. D., Schram, R., Zahedi, P., Boer, J. D., Weijdema, F., Kramer, B., Huijts, M., Hoogerwerf, M., & Ferdinands, G. (2021). An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7
9. Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379, 313.
10. Raitskaya L., & Tikhonova E. (2023). Academic Integrity: Author-Related and Journal-Related Issues. Journal of Language and Education, 9(4), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.18489
11. Tikhonova E., & Raitskaya L. (2023). ChatGPT: Where Is a Silver Lining? Exploring the realm of GPT and large language models. Journal of Language and Education, 9(3), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2023.18119
12. The AI writing on the wall. (2023). Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00613-9
13. Zheng, H., & Zhan, H. (2023). ChatGPT in scientific writing: A cautionary tale. American Journal of Medicine.
Review
For citations:
Mekeko N. Policy of Scientific Journals Regarding the Use of Neural Networks by Authors in Manuscript Preparation. Journal of Employment and Career. 2023;2(4). https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2023.4.45
Email this article 