Preview

Journal of Employment and Career

Advanced search

Characteristics of Intergenerational Dynamics in Workforces: Insights from the Russian Context

https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2024.4.89

Abstract

Introduction: For the first time in modern organizations, representatives of six generations coexist, each with unique expectations and needs. This presents new challenges for management, requiring the adaptation of strategies to the diverse characteristics of these generations.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of implementing Pearce's six-generation interaction model (2020) in Russian organizations, considering generational differences and the specifics of the cultural context.

Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using a survey method among employees of Russian organizations from various generations. The sample included representatives of the Silent Generation, Baby Boomers, Generations X, Y, Z, and Alpha. The analysis covered 250 questionnaires, with data categorized into key topics: cultural characteristics, management strategies, and workplace expectations. Descriptive statistics and content analysis methods were employed for data analysis.

Results: The study confirmed significant differences in expectations and preferences among generations. The Silent Generation and Baby Boomers value stability and mentorship. Generation X prioritizes structured management and long-term prospects. Millennials (Generation Y) focus on career growth and work-life balance, while Generation Z highlights digital technologies and inclusivity as key aspects of the professional environment. Generation Alpha demonstrates readiness for learning and experimentation, focusing on creativity and technology.

Conclusion: Pearce's model (2020) provides effective tools for managing multigenerational teams, but its successful implementation requires consideration of local cultural and organizational specifics. The application of hybrid approaches, combining traditional and innovative strategies, can foster a harmonious work environment and intergenerational collaboration.

About the Author

Natalia Rezepova
Russian University of Economics named after G.V. Plekhanov
Russian Federation


References

1. Строгонова, И. Б. (2021). Изменения в корпоративной культуре Республики Корея на примере дискуссии об отмене хвесик. В К.В. Иванов (Ред.), Россия и Корея: взгляд из Сибири-2021: тезисы и доклады международной научно-практической конференции (с. 186—192). Иркутский государственный университет.

2. Baysal Berkup, S. (2014). Working with generations X and Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(19), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2014.V5N19P218

3. Jun, W., & Rowley, C. (2014). Change and continuity in management systems and corporate performance: Human resource management, corporate culture, risk management, and corporate strategy in South Korea. Business History, 56(3), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.809522

4. Macovei, L., & Martinescu-Bădălan, R. (2022). Generational dynamics in the workplace: Traditional vs. modern approaches. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(3), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2022-0071

5. McCrindle, M. (2020). Understanding generation Alpha: The children of the Millennials. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.

6. Pearce, N. (2020). Building 6G organizations: Strategies for sustainable multigenerational workplaces. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 34–39. https://hbr.org/2024/04/leading-the-6-generation-workforce

7. Platteau, E., Molenveld, A., & Demuzere, S. (2011). Do generational differences regarding organizational culture affect intergenerational conflict? A quantitative study in a local government organization. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1877749

8. Skýpalová, R., Stojanová, H., Troger, H., & Caha, Z. (2023). Human resource management across generations within the context of world of work 4.0. Emerging Science Journal, 7(3), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-013

9. Takatama, M., & Yang, W. (2023). A study of intergenerational empathy based on a survey of text communication characteristics. In A. Marcus, E. Rosenzweig, & M. M. Soares (Eds.), Design, user experience, and usability. HCII 2023. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 14032). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35702-2_25

10. Tikhonova, E.V., Kosycheva, M.A., & Efremova, G.I. (2021). Primary professionalization of foreign students: barriers, stigmatization, adaptation. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education, 25(4), 608-628. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.105.025.202104.608-628

11. Urick, M. J. (2014). The Presentation of self: Dramaturgical theory and generations in organizations. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2014.9618


Review

For citations:


Rezepova N. Characteristics of Intergenerational Dynamics in Workforces: Insights from the Russian Context. Journal of Employment and Career. 2024;3(4). https://doi.org/10.56414/jeac.2024.4.89

Views: 86


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-6856 (Online)