Features of the Ontogenetic Dynamics of Protective-Couping Behavior

Introduction. The theme of ontogenetic dynamics of defense mechanisms and coping strategies is one of the least explored areas in the psychology of defense-coping behavior. A detailed and thorough analysis of this area will contribute to a clearer understanding of the ways to overcome stress and the mechanisms of their formation in different age periods. Understanding the age-related features of defense-coping behavior will lead to the emergence of more effective methods of psychological counseling, psychotherapy, and psychocorrection of various age groups. Such individualization of therapy will increase the well-being of both the individual personality and various social groups and society as a whole.

Purpose. This research conducts a theoretical analysis of research dedicated to ontogenetic changes in coping behavior, analyzes protective psychological mechanisms, and strategies for overcoming stress inherent in different ages. The aim is to identify the patterns of age dynamics of defense-coping behavior and to define its characteristics inherent in different age groups.

Materials and Methods. The study was conducted through a theoretical-methodological analysis of literature dedicated to defense-coping behavior within the framework of its age changes. Methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, and generalization were applied. Monographs and publications of domestic and foreign authors describing cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of the ontogenetic dynamics of defense-coping behavior served as the material for the study.

Results. The characteristics of the defense-coping sphere of personality at different age periods were noted. The similarities and contradictions of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in this sphere were analyzed and summarized. An attempt was made to explain the ontogenetic features of defense-coping behavior from the perspective of age psychology. The results obtained can serve as a basis for developing and conducting experimental studies and applying their data in the field of education, health care, and other areas of social life.

Conclusion. The authors have identified general patterns that provide a basis for further experimental study of the stated problem.

1. Долгова, В. И., Рокицкая, Ю. А., Саламатов, А. А. (2018). Индивидуально-психологические предикторы адаптивного поведения подростков. Вестник Новосибирского государственного педагогического университета, 8(1), 45-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762

2. Лапкина, Е. В. (2010). Психологическая защита и совладание человека в разные периоды взрослости. Ярославский педагогический вестник, (3), 213-218.

3. Ледовская, Т. В., Резчикова, О. А. (2015). Динамика защитного и совладающего поведения студентов на разных курсах обучения. Ярославский педагогический вестник, (4), 194-200.

4. Матяш, Н. В., Павлова, Т. А., Поздняков, Г. В. (2023). Механизмы психологической защиты и ее доминирующие стратегии в общении у старшеклассников и студентов-первокурсников. Известия Саратовского университета. Серия Акмеология образования. Психология развития, 1(45), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2023-12-1-49-57

5. Позднякова, Т. Б. (2020). Механизмы психологической защиты и отношение к здоровью в юношеском возрасте. Ученые записки университета Лесгафта, 11(189), 641-644.

6. Пономарева, И. В. (2021). Защитно-совладающее поведение в подростковом и юношеском возрасте. Известия Саратовского университета. Серия Акмеология образования. Психология развития, 10(2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-150-157

7. Приступа, И. В. (2011). Возрастные особенности использования механизмов психологических защит военнослужащими по призыву как детерминанты социально-психологической адаптации в условиях армии. Армия и общество, 1(25), 27-32.

8. Рассказова, Е. И., Гордеева, Т. О., Осин, Е. Н. (2013). Копинг-стратегии в структуре деятельности и саморегуляции: Психометрические характеристики и возможности применения методики СОРЕ. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 10(1), 82-118.

9. Субботина, Л. Ю., Кузьмич, Е. Н. (2004). Возрастная динамика психологической защиты. Ярославский психологический вестник, (10), 50-54.

10. Хьелл, Л., Зиглер, Д. (2003). Теории личности. М.: Питер.

11. Cramer, P. (2012). Psychological maturity and change in adult defense mechanisms. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.02.011

12. Cramer, P. (2008). Seven pillars of defense mechanism theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1963–1981. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00135.x

13. Cramer, P. (2009). The development of defense mechanisms from pre-adolescence to early adulthood: Do IQ and social class matter? A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01/021

14. Cramer, P. (1991). The Development of Defense Mechanisms. Theory, Research, and Assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9025-1

15. Diehl, M., Chui, H., Hay, E. L., Lumley, M. A., Grühn D, & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2014). Change in coping and defense mechanisms across adulthood: Longitudinal findings in a European American sample. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 634-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033619

16. Diehl, M., Coyle, N., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (1996). Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.127

17. Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Pimley, S., & Novacek, J. (1987). Age differences in stress and coping processes. Psychology and Aging, 2, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.2.171

18. Folkman, S. (1991). Coping across the life span: Theoretical issues. In E. Cummings, A. Greene, & K. Karraker (Ed.), Life-span developmental psychology: Perspectives on stress and coping. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

19. Freud, A. (1966). The ego and the mechanisms of defense. New York: International Universities Press.

20. Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. New York: Academic Press.

21. Labouvie-Vief, G., Chiodo, L. M., Goguen, L. A., Diehl, M., & Orwoll, L. (1995). Representations of self across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 10, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.10.3.404

22. Labouvie-Vief, G,. Diehl, M., Jain, E., & Zhang, F. (2007). Six-year change in affect optimization and affect complexity across the adult life span: A further examination. Psychology and Aging, 22, 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.738

23. Labouvie-Vief, G., Hakim-Larson, J., Hobart, C. J. (1987). Age, ego level, and the life-span development of coping and defense processes. Psychology and Aging, 2, 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.2.3.286

24.

25. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

26. McCrae, R. R. (1989). Age differences and changes in the use of coping mechanisms. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 44, 161–169. https:// doi/10.1093/geronj/44.6.P161

27. McCrae, R. R. (1982). Age differences in the use of coping mechanisms. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 454–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/37.4.454

28. Newman, L. S. (2001). Coping and defense: No clear distinction. American Psychologist, 56, 760–761. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.9.760

29.

30. Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1998). A 50-year longitudinal study of defense use among inner city men: A validation of the DSM-IV defense axis. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 186, 104–111. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199802000-00006

31. Vaillant, G. E., Bond, M., & Vaillant, C. O. (1986). An empirically validated hierarchy of defense mechanisms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(8), 786-794. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1986. 01800080072010

32. Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston: Little.

33. Vaillant, G. E. (1992). Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Washington: American Psychiatric Press.

34. Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.